<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>judson collier [dot] com</title>
    <link>http://judsoncollier.com/index.php/site/index/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>judson@judsoncollier.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-01-07T15:57:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Asking The Hard Questions: TypeKit &amp;amp; Web Licenses</title>
      <link> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/asking_the_hard_questions_typekit_web_licenes/ </link>
      <guid> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/asking_the_hard_questions_typekit_web_licenes/ </guid>
      <description>NOTE: In this article, I pose many questions to both TypeKit and to foundries. I&#8217;m not exactly suggesting these things will happen, but they are in the realm of possibility and should be answered. I&#8217;m a skeptic at best, and I only criticize it because I want web fonts to succeed.

As of late, the hot issue is fonts on the web, with font&#45;face. To keep it simple, Font&#45;Face allows us to upload fonts on our server so *any* font can be used, rather than just the standard set.&amp;nbsp; That said, the fonts are unprotected, so everyones in a tizzy on how to fix that (which is fine; i&#8217;d rather not deal with it, but I don&#8217;t have much of a choice).

So, fast forward a few years later, Jeffery Veen leaves Veer, and creates TypeKit: a system that masks the location of your font so we can now use font&#45;face. Sweet.&amp;nbsp; The Catch? Annual fees, limited by the participation of font foundries. 

In reality, although I totally dig the concept of TypeKit, it doesn&#8217;t seem like a sustainable model for delivering fonts. Realistically we should be getting our web license directly from the foundry, and in a pricing structure that makes more sense.

(Click through for the rest, folks)</description>
      <dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-07T15:57:46+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Most Comprehensive Article on HTML 5 Forms You&#8217;ll Read This Year</title>
      <link>http://diveintohtml5.org/forms.html </link>
      <guid>http://diveintohtml5.org/forms.html </guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-05T02:38:36+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>So this is the New Year?</title>
      <link> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/so_this_is_the_new_year/ </link>
      <guid> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/so_this_is_the_new_year/ </guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-05T02:27:02+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Tidying Up 2009</title>
      <link> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/tidying_up_2009/ </link>
      <guid> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/tidying_up_2009/ </guid>
      <description>Christmas break started today. Which is nice because this year sucked.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-12-19T19:20:13+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Internet Explorer 9 Supports CSS3, still fails miserably.</title>
      <link>http://beta.blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2009/11/18/an-early-look-at-ie9-for-developers.aspx </link>
      <guid>http://beta.blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2009/11/18/an-early-look-at-ie9-for-developers.aspx </guid>
      <description>MSDN posted a new blog about IE9 beta. Normally I wouldn&#8217;t pay attention to anything Microsoft related, but as the existence of Internet Explorer has literally brought me to tears while working, I like to pay a close eye. 

I&#8217;ll try to keep this as unbiased as possible. 

[click through to see the facts. yo. ]</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-12-17T02:14:50+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Vimeo sued for LipDubs</title>
      <link>http://secretenemyhideout.com/post/286184926/vimeo-sued-by-capitol-records-over-lip-dubs </link>
      <guid>http://secretenemyhideout.com/post/286184926/vimeo-sued-by-capitol-records-over-lip-dubs </guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-12-17T02:01:39+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Facebook Profile.</title>
      <link> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/facebook_profile/ </link>
      <guid> http://judsoncollier.com/blog/fullstory/facebook_profile/ </guid>
      <description>I&#8217;m cool with all the new facebook changes, but I&#8217;m not sure how conformable I am with this:

(Yeah, your gonna have to click&#45;through for the punchline. Suck it, RSS).</description>
      <dc:subject>General</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-12-16T18:24:44+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Survey for People Who Make Websites.</title>
      <link>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/survey2009/ </link>
      <guid>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/survey2009/ </guid>
      <description>Help A List Apart compile &#8220;The Survey for People Who Make Websites&#8221;, for the third year in a row.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-12-16T14:27:21+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Flickr Header</title>
      <link>http://flickr.com </link>
      <guid>http://flickr.com </guid>
      <description>I&#8217;ve said it before, but I find the Flickr Header annoying now. The addition of the Yahoo! logo feels out of place.

And the new &#8220;Organize and Create&#8221; button does not flow with the other one word navigation buttons.</description>
      <dc:subject>Links</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T21:18:01+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Expression Engine 2.0 Beta Released</title>
      <link>http://expressionengine.com/public_beta/ </link>
      <guid>http://expressionengine.com/public_beta/ </guid>
      <description>How did I miss this?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-12-11T00:00:48+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>